“EVERY LANE IS A BIKE
LANE” IS BULLSHIT!
Very recently, LA began this new ad campaign ensuring that
“Every lane is a bike lane” and I am calling complete and total bullshit on
that. Let’s call a spade a spade. LA was not designed to be a bike friendly
city. It’s just wasn’t. And the city can’t just declare it one
overnight by putting signs on buses and billboards and painting the
streets. Whether you ride your bike or drive your car,
it’s not a city made for cycling (though I’m not downplaying what the future
may hold). According to www.bicycling.com, LA is #32 on
their list of big city “bike friendly cities” compared to NYC’s #7 slot. 32 ain’t so hot – NYC is more congested and I
have never noticed the cyclists there to be a problem. Here in LA, there are too many cars driving
the same overcongested streets all at the same time (over 3,000,000 registered vehicles according to the
city database). The roads are not big
enough for an actual bike lane on every street.
This is fact, like it or not.

I am 100% in support of people’s individual rights to ride a
bike, walk, rollerblade, drive, etc. I
am most definitely in favor of doing anything we can to save the environment. I
think cycling is a great form of exercise.
That’s all true. But I’m also a
realist and it’s just not realistic to tell cyclists that they can slowly peddle
along in EVERY lane on EVERY street in front of cars, causing even more traffic
and causing some incredibly dangerous situations.
Why EVERY lane? Why not “The right lane is a bike lane.
Share the road.” (Notice the word
SHARE……giving cyclists the right to EVERY lane does not encourage
sharing). The left lane has always been
reserved for faster drivers, for passing other cars, etc. It’s in the driver’s manual. So why the heck does a cyclist need to ride
in the left lane inevitably causing more traffic? Can’t they use the right lane? On multi lane streets such as La Cienega, all
the way from Santa Monica Blvd down to the 405, there are two to three lanes. This poorly thought out law makes it legal
for a gaggle of cyclists to ride in every lane, side by side, on a street where
cars regularly travel 45+ MPH (there’s that stretch south of Rodeo that mimics
a freeway) and block the entire road making it impossible for cars to pass. Who
thought this was a good idea?
This brilliant plan will cost people their lives.
Guaranteed. Watch the stats grow. Just watch.
Cyclists are going to get hit by cars at an increasing rate (according
to Internet reports, LA already has more than double the amount of car vs
bicycle fatalities than any other California city) and drivers are going to get
more impatient and attempt to pass the slow moving bicycles. I just can’t wrap my head around why it had
to be EVERY lane. It’s 100% unnecessary.
What makes this worse, to me, are the amount of arrogant
cyclists who regularly ride on the sidewalks and think they own every inch of
everything. I will reiterate my support
for cycling and choice but on a regular basis, at least in West Hollywood, I
see people riding their bikes on the sidewalks and going through red
lights. And EVERY SINGLE TIME I say something
to a sidewalk cyclist, they get extremely pissy and nasty and act as if they
have every right to the sidewalk. You
were just given EVERY lane, do you really have to be riding on the sidewalk,
too?
**Special disclaimer for my cycling friends (one of whom is
my boyfriend – a very courteous cyclist even though he pretty much never wears
his helmet) and driving guru, Kenny Morse: I understand there are plenty of
horrible and rude drivers who don’t share the road and endanger cyclists’ lives
and drive too fast, who do stupid things, etc, and ya’ll should know by now
that I have my fair share of opinions about them as well….I just cannot support
this new asinine EVERY lane campaign and thus I am bitching about that one law
and not cycling in general. xoxo


